These images make me feel conflicted — I’m both attracted and repelled. That’s a good thing.

Comment by GirlPaint — June 4, 2009

i truly love this

Comment by sarah iskander — May 28, 2009

I love these! Absolutely wonderful… I lake it…

Comment by nurhan mutlu — May 28, 2009

woah!!!!!!! i can draw but not like that!!!!!!! u r super fantstimo!!!!!!!!!! GREAT job do some more!

Comment by cat — May 27, 2009

Hmmm… I thought “leave a comment” meant just that, good, bad or indifferent. I enjoy reading all opinions, so keep them coming. “Anonymous” needs to stop complaining about comments when people are invited to do so.

That being said, this armchair critic would really love to know more about the inspiration behind this work. I couldn’t find anything on the artist’s site. DeeMarie — did you find some info that I couldn’t find?

Comment by Kathryn O — May 27, 2009

yeah JWA, you lambasted the matter of contention right on the proboscus in your elucidation of Casey’s predication to abbreviate articulated juxtapositions of saturnine derivatives. We are all very fascinated with your manipulation of the English lexicon. But seriously, I love your work Casey, even though your work isn’t typical of the Pasedena school, I guess I’ll let it slide this time.

Comment by FirstMiddleLast-no spaces — May 27, 2009

Great stuff. Check out the Artisit Site for more info about what some of the work is about.

Comment by DeeMarie — May 27, 2009

A muted palette and abbreviated articulation in conjunction with a seemingly morose predication. Not the sort of work I’m used to seeing out of the Pasadena school. Competent, though.

Comment by JerryWayneAnderson — May 27, 2009

The artist’s eponymous website seems well-designed: the presentation style suits the art.

Comment by A. Acevedo — May 27, 2009

The painting is a little creepy but so invasive and dark, it has an intense look about it.

Comment by Kash — May 27, 2009